|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
The Jackhammer
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 12:22:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Scagga Laebetrovo Edited by: Scagga Laebetrovo on 23/05/2008 12:06:25 Personally I don't think so. Strictly speaking, these 'spoils of battle' do not change ownership just because you blow their ships up. Think about it, how can you put a claim on something before you've grabbed it off the enemy carcass?
edit: grammar
Then why is it when someone loots from an NPC wreck i've risked my ship to kill is FLAGGED to me ...
PLEASE ... TELL me the difference ...
/support
Thank-You,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.05.23 14:39:00 -
[2]
Edited by: The Jackhammer on 23/05/2008 14:40:48
Originally by: Dav Varan No.
Wreck belongs to Victim.
Grow a pair and PVP in low sec / null sec rather than high sec suicide ganking then you can shoot anyone who goes for the loot.
Concord should not support suicide gankers.
What about LEGAL war targets? ... I'm in no way supporting OR condemning suicide gankers ...
Originally by: Sigul Siento .... I haven't seen anywhere any rule saying that a war dec gives the dec'er rights to the property of the dec'ee ....
Hey BRAINIAC .. thats what this forum is for ... TRYING to create change where people feel the rules need to be 'adjusted' ...
We've been exposed to you 'insightful' opinion now ... so please run along to ANOTHER thread ...
NOTED: Thats 1 more vote against ..
Thank-You,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 17:46:00 -
[3]
Ha Ha ... Broken Head
Matrix Skye - State War Academy
OBVIOUSLY He's a douche bag alt that survives in-game by feeding off of someone else's hard work that needs to burn ...
Next argument for -or- against this ... we know your stance matrix .. please move on
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 20:20:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Matrix Skye There IS RISK TO THE LOOTER.
What's so hard for you to understand about this.
Lets see ... IF you consider a POD a risk ... you should be playing Hello Kitty online ...
PLEANTY of time to loot and be on your merry way because the Original owner still has to get to a station ... dock up ... wait to jump in a ship ... undock and get back to the wreck.
HMMMMM ... sounds like a HUGE risk to the looter ...
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.05.22 20:26:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Matrix Skye Dont be idiotic, Mr. Jackhammer. If the victim happens to have a replacement ship in the system, OR FRIENDS nearby, as you yourself admit he should have, then he IS a threat.
Now if the victim CHOOSES not to persue that is a call for HIM to make, NOT YOU.
Go away already ...
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 21:17:00 -
[6]
Edited by: The Jackhammer on 24/05/2009 21:17:39
Originally by: The PitBoss In empire ... all 3 of us in a field ...
victim is in a pod
victor is in a ship
loot thief is a ship
What exactly is the loot thief's risk ....
THIS
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.05.25 17:57:00 -
[7]
Edited by: The Jackhammer on 25/05/2009 18:00:03
Originally by: Matrix Skye I'm sure that mission-running ship or mining ship had a real good chance at popping your PVP gank-squad
Although I should be considered a weapon of mass destruction ...
One person does not constitute a 'Gank Squad'
Read the quote ... 3 different people in a field with 3 different agendas
Get over yourself
BTW its funny you're assuming that the person in the field is running a mission or mining ... Welcome to eve ... there are a few more reasons to be in a field ... but those you constantly state are the only ones that help your argument and make him look all soooo defenseless.
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 19:43:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Awesome Possum ... And your reward is winning the battle ...
You gotta be the type of TOOL that opts for the 'VERBAL' tip (ie. great job!) when you go out to the restaurant/bar .. RATHER .. than the CASH tip ...
'VERBAL' tips don't pay the bills
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
The Jackhammer
Unity Thru Aggression Unity Thru Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 21:47:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Awesome Possum Damn straight, gratuities are for above par service. I'm not paying someone's wages for vanilla waitressing, that's the restaurant's job.
If you/they don't like it, get a job that pays more than $2/hr.
Thats just showing how ignorant you are ...
1. You've obviously never had to work for tips (ie. someone elses generosity)
2. If you can't afford to tip .. stay your cheap ass home.
3. Servers/bartenders have to pay taxes on what they sell REGUARDLESS of wether you tip or not
4. As for working a 2$/hr job ... if they took away tipping that wage would drastically go up ... along with meals/drinks AND you couldn't afford to go out in the first place ... which obviously you can't do .. so save the headache .. SEE #2
... Back to the topic
Mmmmm,
The Jackhammer
Banners and Signatures by: Kalen Vox
|
|
|
|